Is a Cloud Computing World Flatter, Faster, and More Fun?

October 3, 2011 Off By David
Object Storage
Grazed from Forbes.  Author: Adam Ludwig.

What’s so compelling about cloud technology?

When I was a kid, my first computer was an Apple I. Every application ran locally. Now, with broadband, you can deliver exponentially more computing power and run exponentially more apps. The scale of the capabilities is what makes cloud computing compelling…

Cloud is an adrenaline shot for this age because it creates so much access and choice for customers. It used to be that businesses bought the software and servers, hired all the IT people, and ran it all themselves. With cloud it’s about service at a cheap price that you can access from anywhere when you need it. Manufacturing plants used to make their own electricity, but now of course they buy it from utilities. Data and software are going in the same direction with the cloud. With computing as a service, the pace of change can move at Web speed. Our customers have software they want to run in the cloud, and we enable that for them. We take responsibility for the infrastructure environment for their applications.

Talk about the history of Rackspace and how its service has developed.

Rackspace was founded in 1998 by three students from Trinity University in San Antonio. It’s a classic American story of people who came out of college wanting to start a company. Their vision was based on the idea that people still needed help getting online, so they went into the hosting business.

We started investing in cloud technology about six years ago with the advent of virtualization, which enabled the pooling of machines so you can aggregate larger chunks of compute power. From a customer’s perspective, everything we do is cloud.

If you look at the history of IT, companies want to create products, get customers hooked on them, and then leave them. They’re like drug dealers—they even call their customers users. The most influential, powerful technology companies, like Microsoft and Oracle, have created products and locked customers into them, making it difficult for them to migrate. They wanted to create inelastic demand so they could keep raising prices. Then they charge a maintenance fee. It’s driven by the technology itself, not by customer outcome. We don’t think that way. Customers should have a choice, and it ought to be pleasurable. They should have fun with the technology they buy, not fear it, and their selections should be based on outcome. Those outcomes differ from case to case. Sometimes it’s uptime, sometimes it’s hits, sometimes it’s scalability.