Why Is Cloud Repatriation on the Rise?

Cloud repatriation is the process of pulling workloads from a public cloud platform back to a private cloud or on-premises data center. It does not signal a retreat from cloud services. Instead, IT leaders match every application with the place that offers the best blend of performance, security, cost and governance.

A Look at Cloud Repatriation Trends

Data gathered at the end of 2024 shows momentum for cloud repatriation is still building. In the 2024 Barclays CIO Survey, 83% of technology chiefs said they expect to move at least some public-cloud workloads back on-premises or into private clouds in 2025.

With that said, only a small minority are plotting a full retreat. An October 2024 IDC analysis highlighted that just 8%-9% of companies plan to repatriate all of their cloud workloads — most intend to shift only specific elements such as backups, production data or steady-state computing. At the same time, the appetite for cloud services continues to grow. Gartner forecasts worldwide public-cloud spending will climb to $723.4 billion in 2025 — up 21% from 2024.

The figures confirm that repatriation reflects a maturing hybrid-cloud strategy rather than a wholesale backlash. Enterprises are fine-tuning workload placement by pulling some systems home for cost, performance or compliance reasons while expanding their use of public cloud services that deliver unique value.

Why Workloads Are Moving Home

No single factor dominates every repatriation decision. Many enterprises cite a mix of technical and business pressures that compound over time. These factors rarely operate in isolation — addressing one issue reveals adjacent concerns that collectively push a workload back home.

Performance and Latency Control

Public regions excel for global reach, but trading, enterprise resource planning and shop-floor systems benefit from sub-millisecond latency and hardware tuning that only local infrastructure delivers. Fine-grained control over network fabrics and storage tiers lets IT guarantee response times in ways hyperscale clouds rarely expose.

Run-Rate Cost Overruns

Initial cloud savings can vanish when lift-and-shift workloads run 24/7, piling unpredictable egress and computing fees. Steady-state applications can cost significantly less on fixed, depreciated hardware a company already owns.

Security-Posture Consolidation

Repatriation lets security teams apply familiar on-premises tools to east-west traffic, closing visibility gaps that appeared during rapid cloud migrations. Centralizing logs and controls shortens incident-response times and reduces tooling overlap — a benefit auditors notice.

Data Compliance

Storing records on-premises or in a private cloud simplifies audits and keeps encryption keys within a single jurisdiction. It also streamlines disaster-recovery planning because replicas and archives are subject to the same legal framework.

Reevaluation of Lift-and-Shift Decisions

Early migrations that copied legacy monoliths into cloud virtual machines likely received little modernization benefit. A move back allows teams to refactor into microservices or containers and capture inefficiencies missed the first time.

Vendor Lock-In Avoidance

Proprietary cloud services boost speed but tie workloads to one provider. Rebuilding on open architectures restores negotiating power and lowers rewrite efforts if the company chooses a different cloud later.

Environmental Goals

Some sectors track carbon intensity per transaction. When on-premises facilities run on renewable energy contracts, localizing computing supports sustainability targets and provides carbon metrics that shared hyper-scale reports can’t match.

Continuous Tuning Rather Than Reversal

One of the public cloud’s most significant advantages is scalability. Companies can add or shed capacity on demand without paying extra power, buying racks or expanding physical security. Those benefits explain why overall cloud spend keeps climbing even as some workloads head home.

Company size also steers cloud strategy. Startups and small firms thrive in public clouds where low upfront costs and instant scale ease growth pains. Midsized businesses favor a hybrid approach, keeping sensitive data in the private cloud and everyday apps in public regions. Large enterprises base mission-critical systems on private or on-premises clouds and dip into public services only when these offer a clear edge.

A wholesale exodus is not likely on the horizon, and selective repatriation will likely accelerate through 2025 as leaders tighten budgets and refine risk postures. Cloud and on-premises environments will coexist, with IT teams moving each workload to the venue that makes sense now and moving it again when conditions change.

The Cloud Is a Moving Target

Cloud decisions are not one-and-done — they are part of ongoing optimization. Teams that keep clear cost models, know their latency needs and track regulatory changes will spot when a workload is in the wrong place and act early, whether that means going back to the data center or pushing deeper into the cloud. The goal is not to pick a side but to keep every workload exactly where it delivers the most value.

##

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Zac writes for ReHack as the Features Editor and covers cybersecurity, IT, and business tech. His work has been featured on publications like AllBusiness, CyberTalk, and BLR. For more of his writing, follow him on Twitter or LinkedIn.